What we set out to build
A forecast that models the physics rather than reprinting someone else's feed.
What was built
- Nine phases built test-first, each gated on the previous one
- A physics model verified against worked examples rather than assumed correct
- Database-dependent phases identified and held rather than faked
What it achieves
- A worked example in the source material turned out to be wrong, and the implementation matches the correct value with the discrepancy documented
- The gated phases are marked as gated rather than shipped untested
The stack
TypeScript, Supabase, vitest.
Common questions
How was this built?
A founder brought the idea and the domain knowledge. We brought the team. The founder funded the build with a monthly subscription, and they hold equity in the company that resulted. We label every case study, because a studio that publishes its prices and argues the other side of its own comparisons has to be equally precise about its own portfolio.
What state is it in?
Built, deployment gated. We state that plainly rather than describing everything as production: several things here are deliberately gated, and the reason is usually evidence rather than a missing feature.
Can you build something like this for us?
That is the point of publishing it. The same patterns are in the catalogue at published prices, and you can scope your own version on the plain-English page without contacting us first.
Where to next
If something here is close to what you need, the same patterns are in the catalogue at published prices, or you can describe your version in plain English and get it scoped and priced without talking to anyone.